Knowledge and reasoning boundaries
Define approved sources, freshness, retrieval, uncertainty, citations, refusal behavior, and when the agent must stop.
Agentic Systems / Automate
Build AI Agents With Clear Limits and Human Oversight
Create a focused agent around approved knowledge and tools, with narrow permissions, testing, budgets, logs, and checkpoints for important actions.
Systems from $8,500
Built for Automate
Clear first step
What This Fixes
Automate one useful task with people still in control.
Create a focused agent around approved knowledge and tools, with narrow permissions, testing, budgets, logs, and checkpoints for important actions.
Best fit
Explore the Automate path Organizations with a high-value multi-step workflow that cannot be handled safely by a simple rule, form, search interface, or single model response.
Least-privilege tools
Expose only required functions with strict schemas, authorization, limits, validation, isolation, and consequential-action approvals.
Evaluation and operations
Test normal, edge, adversarial, injection, cost, latency, and failure cases before staged production access.
Choose Your Starting Point
Choose the level that fits what you need now.
Every option is a proposal starting point. Your written scope confirms the final work, schedule, responsibilities, and approved outside costs.
Agent Readiness Review
Choose a practical first use case
$750
one time
Workflow and readiness review
- Task, tool, and data review
- Permission and threat map
- Architecture recommendation
Most common starting point
Agent Pilot
Prove the workflow before expanding
$3,500
starting project
One carefully defined task
- One carefully limited agent task
- Approved tools and human checkpoints
- Evaluation, logging, and operator training
Tool-Using Agent System
Connect tools, approvals, and reporting
$8,500
starting project
Connected multi-step system
- Knowledge, memory, and tool architecture
- Permissions, budgets, and audit trail
- Staged rollout and monitoring
Custom scope: Enterprise work begins at $20,000; voice, model, tool, storage, and monitoring costs remain separate.
Clear From the Start
Know what is included before the work begins.
You should understand what HostAvvy will deliver, what may cost extra, and what we need from you.
What You Get
- Agent task and threat model
- Knowledge, memory, and tool architecture
- Permission and approval matrix
- Agent, interface, and integration implementation
- Evaluation, red-team, cost, and failure suite
- Staged rollout, monitoring, incident, and change runbook
What May Cost Extra
- Software, model, voice, messaging, and storage usage
- Unreviewed high-impact actions
- Guaranteed accuracy, savings, revenue, or uninterrupted providers
What We Need From You
A repeatable task, usable source information, access to the required tools, a person who can approve decisions, and real examples for testing.
Timing: A readiness review comes first; wider use follows only after testing, failure handling, and staff approval.
Review the task
Document the current steps, information, tools, approvals, exceptions, cost, and useful finish line.
Build one controlled pilot
Automate one carefully defined task with narrow access, clear review points, and visible failure handling.
Test before expanding
Measure quality, cost, failures, and staff feedback before adding more users, tools, or decisions.
Example Deliverable
Preview the kind of clarity this work creates.
A limited design showing allowed tools, validation, budgets, logs, approvals, and stop conditions.
Illustrative capability example - not a client result
Agent approval mapHostAvvy sample
Straight Answers
Questions worth answering before you start.
HostAvvy does not assume full autonomy is appropriate. Scope, reversibility, permissions, cost, impact, uncertainty, and regulation determine required checkpoints.
The architecture can be provider-aware or provider-neutral based on capability, privacy, latency, cost, reliability, contract, and portability needs.
Voice may be included after telephony, recording, disclosure, consent, latency, interruption, identity, escalation, and provider requirements are accepted.
Sources and tools are treated as untrusted, permissions stay narrow, outputs are validated, sensitive actions require approval, and adversarial cases are tested and monitored.
Your Next Step
See a recommended plan before sharing contact details.
Answer six short questions, review the best starting path, and continue only when the recommendation makes sense.
